sp1rit Exe Binder - Page 2

murk · #11 (**permalink**) 10-01-2008, 10:51 PM

installed in VM and sniffed connections...does not seem to be backdoored. A moot point as it doesn't work.

**GeoffreyF67** · #12 (**permalink**) 10-01-2008, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ph4dge

so just run it in VM like I do, then it doesn't really matter - I'm sure we'll all know sooner or later.

I miss the days when I thought that was the case as well...

G-Man

**ph4dge** · #13 (**permalink**) 10-01-2008, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeoffreyF67

I miss the days when I thought that was the case as well...

G-Man

Can you clarify that, lots of people here do their testing in VM...if there are problems with that please elaborate. Although I'm still pretty confident that a VM install of Windows running on top of a Linux distro isn't going to result in an infection of the underlying OS

**jman1050** · #14 (**permalink**) 10-11-2008, 09:09 PM

Sandbox and use a network analyzer like Net Limiter Pro

**Voxelite** · #15 (**permalink**) 10-11-2008, 10:56 PM

Some malware even has anti-sandbox these days, along with anti-VM, anti-debug, and anti-heuristics. Therefore, the only real way to test these things is using something like Deepfreeze. It works extremely well.

**Ace** · #16 (**permalink**) 10-12-2008, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voxelite

Some malware even has anti-sandbox these days, along with anti-VM, anti-debug, and anti-heuristics. Therefore, the only real way to test these things is using something like Deepfreeze. It works extremely well.

Agreed, there isn't anything that can beat deep freeze these days.

**BHExcellence** · #17 (**permalink**) 10-16-2008, 12:24 AM

FYI: B - Basic binder

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode